THE CATCH STRUCTURE BASED SETTING THE MULTISPECIES FISHERY IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF FISHING IN THE PETROPAVLOVSK-COMMANDER SUBZONE IN 2003–2017

Species structure of the catches in different types of fishing (in exception of salmon fishing) was analyzed on the data of the sectoral monitoring system (OSM) of the Federal Agency for Fishery and of scientific research for 2003–2017 provided within the Petropavlovsk-Commander subzone. Results of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the catches made on the OSM or scientific data are found generally same in all cases except the bottom trawling. However, the magnitude of the by-catch demoinstrated by the OSM is lower in all cases comparing to the data observed. Results of the analysis can be used as a basis for changing the current system of fishing permits for a system based on a complex of fish species observed in the catches of each particular type of fishing gear.

1. Balykin P.A., Terentyev D.A. Organization of multi-species fishing on the example of the Karaginsky subzone. Problems of Fisheries, 2004, vol. 5, No. 3 (19), pp. 489–499. (In Russian)

2. Buslov A.V. Possibility of organization and regulation of multi-species fishery under contemporary conditions on the example of Petropavlovsk-Commander subzone (Eastern Kamchatka). Problems of Fisheries, 2006, vol. 7, No. 26, pp. 267–276. (In Russian)

3. Vasilets P.M., Terentyev D.A. Characterization of fisheries in the Petropavlovsk-Commander subzone in 2001–2006 on the data of the SS Rybolovstvo. The researches of the aquatic biological resources of Kamchatka and the north-west part of the Pacific Ocean, 2008, vol. 10, pp. 116–135. (In Russian with English abstracts)

4. Vasilets P.M., Terentyev D.A., Matveev A.A., Ovcherenko R.T., Pyrkov V.N. The structure of the Danish seine catches within the Petropavlovsk-Commander commercial fishery subzone in 2003–2017. The researches of the aquatic biological resources of Kamchatka and the north-west part of the Pacific Ocean, 2019, vol. 52, pp. 89–107. (In Russian with English abstracts)

5. Kochikov V.N. Mezhvedomstvennaya ikhtiologicheskaya komissiya podnimayet vazhnyye problemy rybolovstva [The interagency ichthyological commission raises important fisheries issues]. Anal. i ref. inf. Ser. Biopromysl. i ekon. vopr. mirovogo rybolovstva. Vseros. n.-i. i proyekt.-konstrukt. in-t ekon., inf. i ASU ryb. khoz-va, 1997, No. 6, pp. 21–29.

6. Orlov A.M. Biological aspects of the problem of non-commercialby-catch reduction and fish biodiversity conservation. Materials of V scientific conference “Conservation of biodiversity of Kamchatka and coastal waters”. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy: Kamchatpress, 2004, pp. 132–135. (In Russian)

7. Pyrkov V.N., Solodilov A.V., Degai A.Yu. Development and implementation of new satellite techniques in the fishery monitoring system. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2015, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 251–262. (In Russian)

8. The position on the functioning of the sectoral hierarchical information-analytical automated system for the management of the use of aquatic bioresources. Appendix to the order of the State Fishery Committee of Russia of 10.10.1996, No. 185, 78 p. (In Russian). Available at http://base.garant.ru/5443234/53f89421bbdaf741eb2d1ecc4ddb4c33

9. On the Approval of Fishing Rules for the Far Eastern Fisheries Basin. Order of the Ministry of Agriculure of Russia of 21.10.2013 No. 385 (Edited on 20.04.2017). (In Russian). Available at www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_158838

10. On Amendments to the Fisheries Rules for the Far Eastern Fisheries Basin. Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation dated 04.06.2018 No. 228 “Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation dated October 21, 2013 No. 385”. rg.ru/2018/06/22/msx-prikaz-228-site-dok.html

11. Terentyev D.A. Struktura ulovov morskikh rybnykh promyslov i mnogovidovoe rybolovstvo v prikamchatskikh vodakh: Diss. kand. biol. nauk [Catch composition of marine fisheries and multi-species fishery in Kamchatka adjacent waters. Cand. biol. sci. thesis]. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 2006, 188 p.

12. Sheiko B.A., Fedorov V.V. Glava 1. Klass Cephalaspidomorphi – Minogi. Klass Chondrichthyes – Khryashchevye Ryby. Klass Holocephali – Tsel’nogolovye. Klass Osteichthyes – Kostnye Ryby. [Chapter 1. Class Cephalaspidomorphi – Lampreys. Class Chondrichthyes – Cartilaginous Fishes. Class Holocephali – Chimaeras. Class Osteichthyes – Bony Fishes.]. Catalog of vertebrates of Kamchatka and adjacent waters. R.S. Moiseev, A.M. Tokranov (eds.). Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: Kamchatsky Pechatniy Dvor, 2000, pp. 7–69 (166 p.). (In Russian)

13. Alverson D.L. 1999. Some observations on the science of bycatch. Marine Technology Society Journal. 33 (2). P. 6–12.

14. Alverson D.L., Hughes S.E. 1996. Bycatch: from emotion to effective natural resources management. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 6 (4). P. 443–462.

15. Botsford Louis W., Castilla Juan Carlos., Peterson Charles H. 1997. The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems // Science. № 5325. C. 509–515.

16. Hall M.A., Alverson D.L., Metuzals K.I. 2000. Bycatch: problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 41 (1–6). P. 204–219.

17. Lane Daniel E., Stephenson Robert L. 1995. Fisheries management science: The framework to linc biological, economic and social objectives in fishing management // Aquat. Living Reusor. № 3. C. 215–221.

18. Smith Estellie M. 1995. The nature of Nature: Conflict and consensus in fisheries management // Aquat. Living Reusor. № 3. C. 209–213.

19. Wang H. 2004. Ecosystem Management and Its Application to LMEs // Ocean development and International Law. 35. P. 41–47.